Patient concerns and physician strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 vaccination is critical for reducing serious illness and hospitalizations, yet many remain hesitant. We conducted a survey of frontline physicians to identify patient concerns and physician strategies to address COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy. METHODS: A national random sample of physicians in frontline specialties selected from a comprehensive list of practicing physicians in the U.S. were emailed a survey in August 2021. Multiple choice and open-ended questions inquired about patient concerns related to the COVID-19 vaccines and strategies used by physicians to counter vaccine misinformation and encourage vaccine-hesitant patients. Weighting was applied to achieve representativeness and reduce non-response bias. Network analysis examined co-occurring patient concerns. Open-ended responses on communication strategies were coded via thematic analysis. Multi-variable logistic regression examined associations between physician and pandemic characteristics with patient concerns and use of communication strategies. RESULTS: 531 physicians responded: primary care (241); emergency medicine (142); critical care (84); hospitalists (34); and infectious disease (30). Weighted response balance statistics showed excellent balance between respondents and nonrespondents. On average, physicians reported four patient vaccine concerns. Safety, side effects, vaccine misinformation, and mistrust in government were most common, and often co-occurring. 297 physicians described communication strategies: 180 (61 %) provided vaccine education and 94 (32 %) created a safe space for vaccine discussion. Narrative responses from physicians provided compelling examples of both successes and communication challenges arising from misinformation. Compared with emergency medicine, critical care (OR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.14, 5.24), infectious disease (OR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.00, 6.02), and primary care physicians (OR 1.66, 95 % CI 1.02, 2.70) were more likely to provide communication strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians engage with vaccine hesitant patients using a variety of strategies. Dissemination of effective system and physician-level communication interventions could enhance physician success.

Should an emergency physician be a "surgeon" in a rural area? A case of blunt cardiac rupture successfully treated by an emergency physician.

Objective: Blunt cardiac rupture is a life-threatening injury that requires surgical repair by cardiovascular or trauma surgeons. We report a case of blunt cardiac rupture in a rural area in which emergency physicians performed emergency department thoracotomy and surgical repair to save the patient's life. Patient and Methods: This case involved an 18-year-old female who was injured in a traffic accident and underwent emergency thoracotomy and surgical repair. Results: The patient's left thorax was deformed, and sonographic assessment revealed pericardial effusion. She experienced cardiopulmonary arrest 13 min after hospital arrival. An emergency physician performed an emergency department thoracotomy. The clots were removed from the surface of the left ventricle, followed by wound compression to control bleeding from the ruptured left ventricular wall. After the recovery of spontaneous circulation, the emergency physician sutured the ruptured heart. The patient survived with good neurological function. Conclusion: In rural areas, blunt cardiac rupture may require emergency department thoracotomy and cardiac repair by emergency physicians. The establishment of educational systems that include continuous education on trauma surgical procedures and consensus guidelines is needed to assist rural emergency physicians in performing surgical procedures.

Effectiveness of Doctor Clerks Supporting Physicians' Work in Japan: A Systematic Review.

The burgeoning administrative workload on physicians in Japan's healthcare system has necessitated innovative approaches to optimize clinical care. Integrating doctor clerks, tasked with administrative and clerical duties, has emerged as a potential solution to alleviate this burden. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of doctor clerks in improving physicians' working conditions and patient care quality. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Ichushi Web and Google Scholar from January 2000 to September 2023. Data were extracted on publication year, study setting, department focus, work scope, and outcomes of doctor clerk implementation. The search identified 3570 studies, with 17 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were performed in general hospitals with 76.5% (13/17). The studies regarding university hospitals were 17.6% (3/17). Only one study was performed in a community hospital with 5.9% (1/17). More than half of doctor clerks worked not explicitly allocated to one department and did their work not specific to one department with 52.9% (9/17). Three studies report that doctor clerks collaborate with orthopedic surgeons. Two studies report that doctor clerks collaborate with emergency medicine physicians. Each study reports that doctor clerks collaborate with respiratory or general medicine. The most frequent is document support, with 94.1% (16/17). The second most frequent working content is consultation support, with 47.1% (8/17). The third most frequently working content is ordering support, with 23.5% (4/17). Call response, secretary work, education support, research support, conference support, and other professional support are included, each with 5.9% (1/17). Regarding clinical outcomes, five studies assessed a reduction in physician paperwork time (29.4%). Four studies assessed the frequency of the contents of doctor clerks' work (23.5%). Four studies assessed the positive perception of physicians (23.5%). Four studies assessed the amount of the reduction in physicians' overtime work (23.5%). Three studies assess the amount of the reduction in hospital costs (17.6%). One study assessed part-time physicians' fatigue reduction (5.9%). Each study assessed the quality of patient care, such as doctor's clerk education for standardization, increase in the number of patients accepted, reduction in medical incidents, decrease in patient waiting time, and primary to tertiary prevention. Introducing doctor clerks in Japan's healthcare system shows promise in enhancing physicians' working conditions and potentially improving patient care. However, conclusive evidence on the impact on patient care quality necessitates further investigation, serving as a foundation for future policy and healthcare system optimization.

How Physicians Should Respond to Climate Change.

Urgent warnings about the existential threat of climate change are coming from leaders in nearly every sector of society, including virtually all climate scientists, notable heads of civil governments around the globe, the world's top religious leaders, prestigious medical journals, as well as principals of the largest financial firms. Surveys show that the majority of U.S. physicians in several specialties are caring for patients who are experiencing direct health harms due to climate change. In public platforms, physicians are expressing their awareness that this public health crisis places everyone at risk, but many people are at greater risk, including children, pregnant women, people with chronic health conditions, elders, and those who experience environmental injustice or live in harm's way. Physicians should respond to this crisis with meaningful activities performed within the context of their current roles. The role of medical care provider is the best known role. But, throughout their careers, physicians have ongoing responsibilities as educators of colleagues, trainees, and patients. They are influential employees of medical institutions, trusted experts who exercise civic responsibility, and sources of guidance for public policymakers. Physicians and other health professionals, individually and through their organizations, also work to influence our societal response to the challenge of climate change. The first annual Lancet Journal Countdown Report in 2016 tracking health indicators of climate change stated that climate change had the potential to wipe out all public health gains of the last half century, but it also presents a tremendous opportunity to save lives and improve health. All physicians should work toward the latter outcome.

German first-year medical students' expectations of their professional life - concerns and hopes: A project report.

Aim: Expectations among medical students towards their future professional life are affected by intrinsic and extrinsic factors which may change during years of medical school. The aim of this study is to gain further insight into students' expectations of their professional life at the beginning of medical school. Findings regarding contextual influences can be used to improve curricula and student guidance. Methods: The project report based on an online survey among three cohorts of first year medical students at the LMU. The questionnaire consisted of six open-ended questions which addressed the student's motivation, expectations, anticipations and concerns of their professional life. Questions were also asked about presumed personal development and influence on private life. An inductive coding was used in this qualitative content analysis. Results: Written responses from 591 participants were coded, categorized and summarized into four main themes: personal life, work, science, personal issue. Despite coming from different cohorts, the occurrence of the main themes showed the same trend in all student groups. Students are worried most about the work-life-balance, and they expect it to be a difficult issue. But many of our first-year students are optimistic that they will be able to establish a good work-life-balance or that the working conditions will have changed to a manageable workload at the time they will enter their first jobs. The majority of our students expect to become more self-confident with enhanced empathy and team-working ability and more patient and stress-resistant in daily challenges. Conclusion: The medical students emphasize the gender-neutral desire for work-life balance. So, they expect improved working conditions for the future - an ongoing challenge for the health care system.

The Presence of a Physician Role Model and the Career Preference of Medical Students Are Associated With Rural Self-efficacy.

Rural career preference is known to be affected by rural self-efficacy. This study aims to explore whether the presence of a physician role model and having a medical department of interest influence rural self-efficacy among medical students. The study sample comprised 813 students (464 male and 349 female). We assessed rural self-efficacy using a validated scale that comprised 15 questions. The effect of the presence of a physician role model and the choice of medical department on rural self-efficacy score was examined. Multivariable-adjusted regression analysis showed that the presence of a physician role model was significantly associated with the rural self-efficacy score (ß = 0.236, p < 0.001), as were gender (ß = -0.096, p = 0.004), admission while living in hometown (ß = 0.077, p = 0.041), receiving a scholarship for regional duty (ß = 0.079, p = 0.025), admission based on school recommendation (ß = 0.077, p = 0.031), and subjective difficulty with living in a rural area (ß = -0.201, p < 0.001). Moreover, a higher rural self-efficacy score was significantly associated with students who listed general medicine/family medicine (ß = 0.204, p < 0.001), pediatrics (ß = 0.098, p = 0.004), or obstetrics and gynecology (ß = 0.108, p = 0.002) as their department of choice, while anesthesiology (ß = -0.075, p = 0.023) was significantly associated with a lower rural self-efficacy score. These relationships were consistent for both males and females. The presence of a physician role model and the choice of medical department are important factors for higher rural self-efficacy scores.

Are Pediatric Residents in Saudi Arabia Equipped to Provide Breastfeeding Care? A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: There is a progressive reduction in breastfeeding rates in Saudi Arabia. Counseling and support from health-care providers are useful in overcoming barriers to continuing breastfeeding. However, medical education and residency programs often do not adequately provide breastfeeding training. Objective: To determine the knowledge, comfort level, perception, and clinical practices of pediatric residents regarding breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia and to measure the level and type of education received during their residency training. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included pediatric residents from across Saudi Arabia who were registered with the Saudi Commission for Health Sciences and was conducted from February 2021 to January 2022. A validated self-reported questionnaire was used to elicit information from the respondents. Knowledge score was calculated as a percentage of correct answers. Results: A total of 253 residents completed the survey. The mean knowledge score was 58.4% ± 22.7%, which was lower than the cut-off threshold of good knowledge. Almost half of the residents (49.4%) were confident about addressing breastfeeding-related concerns. Although nearly all residents (91.7%) agreed that breastfeeding promotion is part of their role, 35% never or rarely met the mother before birth to discuss breastfeeding. Didactic teaching was the most prevalent educational tool during their training (34.3%); however, most residents preferred learning through interactive workshops (83.7%) and following lactation consultants (82.8%). Conclusion: Despite positive perceptions and confidence in providing breastfeeding care, pediatric residents in Saudi Arabia lack optimal knowledge of breastfeeding. These findings indicate the need for enhancing breastfeeding curricula in pediatric residency programs to improve breastfeeding consultation and management.

Survival Outcomes in Palliative Sedation Based on Referring Versus On-Call Physician Prescription.

This study sought to determine the survival duration of patients who underwent palliative sedation, comparing those who received prescriptions from referring physicians versus on-call physicians. It included all patients over 18 years old who died in the Palliative Care, Internal Medicine, and Oncology units at the Hospital Universitario of Jerez de la Frontera between 1 January 2019, and 31 December 2019. Various factors were analyzed, including age, gender, oncological or non-oncological disease, type of primary tumor and refractory symptoms. Statistical analysis was employed to compare survival times between patients who received palliative sedation from referring physicians and those prescribed by on-call physicians, while accounting for other potential confounding variables. This study revealed that the median survival time after the initiation of palliative sedation was 25 h, with an interquartile range of 8 to 48 h. Notably, if the sedation was prescribed by referring physicians, the median survival time was 30 h, while it decreased to 17 h when prescribed by on-call physicians (RR 0.357; 95% CI 0.146-0.873; p = 0.024). Furthermore, dyspnea as a refractory symptom was associated with a shorter survival time (RR 0.307; 95% CI 0.095-0.985; p = 0.047). The findings suggest that the on-call physician often administered palliative sedation to rapidly deteriorating patients, particularly those experiencing dyspnea, which likely contributed to the shorter survival time following sedation initiation. This study underscores the importance of careful patient selection and prompt initiation of palliative sedation to alleviate suffering.

Becoming a Phronimos: Evidence-Based Medicine, Clinical Decision Making, and the Role of Practical Wisdom in Primary Care.

There has been much discussion about the overmedicalization of human experience and the problems incurred by overzealous action-oriented medical care. In this paper we describe the Aristotelean virtue of phronesis, or practical wisdom, and discuss how it can be developed by interested clinicians. We argue that becoming a phronimos requires conscious attention to one's practice by using feedback to continually improve. But there must also be judicious adherence to clinical practice guidelines and advocacy for people-as-patients at individual, community, and national levels.

Doctors' experiences when treating doctor-patients: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: To work effectively, doctors need to look after themselves. They often delay seeking medical care for a range of reasons. Once they do, there is evidence that the doctors treating them ('treating doctors') can struggle to provide optimal care. AIM: To examine existing literature on what is currently known about experiences for treating doctors, in particular GPs, when their patient is also a doctor. DESIGN & SETTING: A scoping review of articles written in English. METHOD: Using the JBI methodological framework for scoping reviews, five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL [Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health], Google Scholar, and Scopus) were searched from the database start date until 31 December 2022. Qualitative and quantitative studies reporting the treating doctor's experience, guidelines for treating doctors, expert opinion articles, and editorials were included. Grey literature was considered, searching the first 10 pages of two Google searches. RESULTS: Forty-eight articles from eight countries met inclusion criteria, of which 12 were research studies. The main areas of focus were as follows: affective responses, which included anxiety about being criticised, concern about upsetting the doctor-patient, and discomfort regarding the acknowledgement that doctors get sick; relational factors, which included boundary issues, over-identifying with the doctor-patient, treating them as a colleague rather than a patient, and role ambiguity; confidentiality, which incorporated both affective and relational aspects; and influence of medical culture and socialisation on dynamics between treating doctor and doctor-patient. These findings have been distilled into a list of key suggestions for the treating doctor. CONCLUSION: Doctors can find treating doctor-patients anxiety-provoking and challenging. The sources of this discomfort are multifaceted, and more empirical research is needed to better understand and address the complex relationship between treating doctor and doctor-patient.

Physician utilization in prehospital emergency medical services in Europe: an overview and comparison. / Visión general y comparación de la presencia de médicos en los servicios de emergencias médicas prehospitalarios en Europa.

OBJECTIVES: National and regional systems for emergency medical care provision may differ greatly. We sought to determine whether or not physicians are utilized in prehospital care and to what extent they are present in differentEuropean countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected information on 32 European countries by reviewing publications and sending questionnaires to authors of relevant articles as well as to officials of ministries of health (or equivalent), representatives of national societies in emergency medicine, or well-known experts in the specialty. RESULTS: Thirty of the 32 of European countries we studied (94%) employ physicians in prehospital emergency medical services. In 17 of the 32 (53%), general practitioners also participate in prehospital emergency care. Emergency system models were described as Franco-German in 27 countries (84%), as hybrid in 17 (53%), and as Anglo-American in 14 (44%). Multiple models were present simultaneously in 17 countries (53%). We were able to differentiate between national prehospital emergency systems with a novel classification based on tiers reflecting the degree of physician utilization in the countries. We also grouped the national systems by average population and area served. CONCLUSION: There are notable differences in system designs and intensity of physician utilization between different geographic areas, countries, and regions in Europe. Several archetypal models (Franco-German, hybrid, and Anglo- American) exist simultaneously across Europe.

OBJETIVO: Los sistemas nacionales y regionales de prestación de atención médica a las emergencias pueden diferir mucho entre sí. Se buscó dilucidar la presencia de médicos en la atención prehospitalaria y su implantación en los diferentes países europeos. METODO: Se analizaron los datos de 32 países europeos recogidos mediante la revisión de artículos publicados y a través de cuestionarios enviados a los autores de artículos científicos pertinentes, funcionarios del ministerio de sanidad (o equivalente), representantes de sociedades nacionales de medicina de urgencias o expertos reconocidos en medicina de urgencias. RESULTADOS: Treinta de los 32 países europeos investigados (94%) disponen de médicos en los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios. En 17 de 32 (53%), los médicos generalistas también participan en la atención a las emergencias prehospitalarias. Los modelos de los sistemas de emergencias médicas (SEM) se describieron como francoalemanes en 27 países (84%), híbridos en 17 (53%) o angloamericanos en 14 (44%). En 17 países (53%), coexistían diferentes modelos. Utilizando una nueva forma de clasificación por niveles, basada en la población media y el área atendida por el SEM prehospitalario, se pudieron diferenciar claramente los diferentes modelos existentes. CONCLUSIONES: Se observan notables diferencias en los diseños de los SEM y en la presencia de los médicos entre las diferentes áreas geográficas, países y regiones de Europa. Coexisten varios modelos (francoalemán, híbrido y angloamericano), algunos simultáneamente, en los diferentes países.

Visión general y comparación de la presencia de médicos en los servicios de emergencias médicas prehospitalarios en Europa / Physician utilization in prehospital emergency medical services in Europe: an overview and comparison

Antecedentes: Los sistemas nacionales y regionales de prestación de atención médica a las emergencias pueden diferir mucho entre sí. Se buscó dilucidar la presencia de médicos en la atención prehospitalaria y su implantación en los diferentes países europeos. Métodos: Se analizaron los datos de 32 países europeos recogidos mediante la revisión de artículos publicados y a través de cuestionarios enviados a los autores de artículos científicos pertinentes, funcionarios del ministerio de sanidad (o equivalente), representantes de sociedades nacionales de medicina de urgencias o expertos reconocidos en medicina de urgencias. Resultados: Treinta de los 32 países europeos investigados (94%) disponen de médicos en los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios. En 17 de 32 (53%), los médicos generalistas también participan en la atención a las emergencias prehospitalarias. Los modelos de los sistemas de emergencias médicas (SEM) se describieron como francoalemanes en 27 países (84%), híbridos en 17 (53%) o angloamericanos en 14 (44%). En 17 países (53%), coexistían diferentes modelos. Utilizando una nueva forma de clasificación por niveles, basada en la población media y el área atendida por el SEM prehospitalario, se pudieron diferenciar claramente los diferentes modelos existentes. Conclusiones: Se observan notables diferencias en los diseños de los SEM y en la presencia de los médicos entre las diferentes áreas geográficas, países y regiones de Europa. Coexisten varios modelos (francoalemán, híbrido y angloamericano), algunos simultáneamente, en los diferentes países. (AU)

Background: National and regional systems for emergency medical care provision may differ greatly. We sought to determine whether or not physicians are utilized in prehospital care and to what extent they are present in different European countries. Methods: We collected information on 32 European countries by reviewing publications and sending questionnairesto authors of relevant articles as well as to officials of ministries of health (or equivalent), representatives of national societies in emergency medicine, or well-known experts in the specialty. Results: Thirty of the 32 of European countries we studied (94%) employ physicians in prehospital emergency medical services. In 17 of the 32 (53%), general practitioners also participate in prehospital emergency care. Emergency system models were described as Franco-German in 27 countries (84%), as hybrid in 17 (53%), and as Anglo-American in 14(44%). Multiple models were present simultaneously in 17 countries (53%). We were able to differentiate between national prehospital emergency systems with a novel classification based on tiers reflecting the degree of physician utilization in the countries. We also grouped the national systems by average population and area served. Conclusions: There are notable differences in system designs and intensity of physician utilization between different geographic areas, countries, and regions in Europe. Several archetypal models (Franco-German, hybrid, and AngloAmerican) exist simultaneously across Europe. (AU)

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Providing Recommendations During Goals-of-Care Conversations: A Multisite Survey.

Background: Goals-of-care conversations (GoCCs) are essential for individualized end-of-life care. Shared decision-making (SDM) that elicits patients' goals and values to collaboratively make life sustaining treatment (LST) decisions is best practice. However, it is unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic onset and associated changes to care delivery, stress on providers, and clinical uncertainty affected SDM and recommendation-making during GoCCs. Aim: To assess providers' attitudes and behaviors related to GoCCs during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify factors associated with provision of LST recommendations. Design: Survey of United States Veterans Health Administration (VA) health care providers. Setting/Participants: Health care providers from 20 VA facilities with high COVID-19 caseloads early in the pandemic who had authority to place LST orders and practiced in select specialties (n = 3398). Results: We had 323 respondents (9.5% adjusted response rate). Most were age ≥50 years (51%), female (63%), non-Hispanic white (64%), and had ≥1 GoCC per week during peak-COVID-19 (78%). Compared with pre-COVID-19, providers believed it was less appropriate and felt less comfortable giving an LST recommendation during peak-COVID-19 (p < 0.001). One-third (32%) reported either "never" or "rarely" giving an LST recommendation during GoCCs at peak-COVID-19. In adjusted regression models, being a physician and discussing patients' goals and values were positively associated with giving an LST recommendation (B = 0.380, p = 0.031 and B = 0.400, p < 0.001, respectively) at peak-COVID-19. Conclusion: Providers who discuss patients' preferences and values are more likely to report giving a recommendation; both behaviors are markers of SDM during GoCCs. Our findings suggest potential areas for training in conducting patient-centered GoCCs.

Cardiac radiology in Europe: status and vision by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) and the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routine radiological examinations for diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac disease. The expected growth in cardiac radiology in the coming years will exceed the current scanner capacity and trained workforce. The European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) focuses on supporting and strengthening the role of cardiac cross-sectional imaging in Europe from a multi-modality perspective. Together with the European Society of Radiology (ESR), the ESCR has taken the initiative to describe the current status of, a vision for, and the required activities in cardiac radiology to sustain, increase and optimize the quality and availability of cardiac imaging and experienced radiologists across Europe. KEY POINTS: • Providing adequate availability for performing and interpreting cardiac CT and MRI is essential, especially with expanding indications. • The radiologist has a central role in non-invasive cardiac imaging examinations which encompasses the entire process from selecting the best modality to answer the referring physician's clinical question to long-term image storage. • Optimal radiological education and training, knowledge of the imaging process, regular updating of diagnostic standards, and close collaboration with colleagues from other specialties are essential.

[The role of private geriatricians in the health care system (2/2): comprehensive qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews]. / Rôle des gériatres libéraux dans le système de santé (2/2) : analyse qualitative compréhensive par entretiens semi-dirigés.

Private geriatricians report heterogeneous practices, while the specialty as a whole is questioning its model. We conducted semi-structured interviews to understand how private geriatricians viewed their role in the health care system. They report a certain homogeneity in their conception of their role, which corresponds to that of geriatricians as a whole: there seems to be a professional identity for geriatrics.

[Role of private geriatricians in the health care system (1/2): quantitative descriptive analysis by questionnaire]. / Rôle des gériatres libéraux dans le système de santé (1/2) : analyse quantitative descriptive par questionnaire.

Private practice geriatrics is a little known practice modality. We conducted a questionnaire survey to try to describe the role of private geriatricians in the health care system. Although few in number, private geriatricians report very different practices, including their conception of their role. This is the first monograph on the activity of private geriatricians, and the results have motivated us to propose a comprehensive analysis of this role.

Semblance of a physician: medical students' experiences during Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus clinic simulation / Com o semblante de médico: experiências de estudantes de medicina durante a simulação clínica em Diabetes tipo 2 / Con el semblante de médico: experiencias de estudiantes de medicina durante la simulación clínica en Diabetes tipo 2

This qualitative research aimed to understand the experiences of a fourth-year medical class during two clinical simulation scenarios of type 2 diabetes management in Primary Care. Ten simulated students were interviewed. The results describe the symbolic conception of diabetes and its treatment as anguish, damage, condemnation and an unpleasant sentence that affects the appropriation and performance of the medical role by students. Considering Medical Psychology, we suggest that such subjective factors should be addressed in teaching-learning in addition to commonly cognitive aspects mentioned in the medical education literature in order for students to develop the work profile to cope with diabetes in Primary Care. Clinical simulation facilitates the subjective approach through its group support component to promote reflection, insights and self-awareness.(AU)

Esta pesquisa qualitativa objetivou compreender as experiências de estudantes de um quarto ano médico durante dois cenários de simulação clínica do manejo do diabetes tipo 2 na Atenção Primária. Dez estudantes simulados foram entrevistados. Os resultados descrevem a concepção simbólica do diabetes e seu tratamento como angústia, dano, condenação e uma sentença desagradável que afeta a apropriação e o desempenho do papel médico pelos estudantes. Considerando a Psicologia Médica, sugerimos que os fatores subjetivos apontados devem ser abordados no ensino-aprendizado além de aspectos cognitivos mais comuns na literatura de educação médica para que os estudantes desenvolvam o perfil de trabalho ao enfrentamento do diabetes na Atenção Primária. A simulação clínica permite esta abordagem subjetiva por seu componente de suporte grupal promovendo reflexão, insights e autoconsciência.(AU)

Esta encuesta cualitativa tuvo el objetivo de comprender las experiencias de estudiantes del cuarto año de medicina durante dos escenarios de simulación clínica del manejo de la diabetes tipo 2 en la Atención Primaria. Fueron entrevistados 10 estudiantes simulados. Los resultados describen la concepción simbólica de la diabetes y su tratamiento, tales como angustia, daño, condenación y una sentencia desagradable que afecta la apropiación y el desempeño del papel médico por parte de los estudiantes. Considerando la Psicología Médica, sugerimos que los factores subjetivos señalados deben abordarse en la enseñanza-aprendizaje, más allá de aspectos cognitivos más comunes en la literatura de educación médica para que los estudiantes desarrollen el perfil de trabajo para el enfrentamiento de la diabetes en la Atención Primaria. La simulación clínica permite este abordaje subjetivo por su componente de soporte grupal promoviendo reflexión, insights y autoconciencia.(AU)

Aspectos relacionados ao estudante na construção da identidade médica: uma revisão integrativa / Student-related aspects in the construction of the Medical Identity: an integrative review

Resumo: Introdução: A construção da identidade médica (IM) é fenômeno dinâmico influenciado por fatores relacionados ao estudante, ao ambiente educacional e à sociedade. Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo sintetizar o conhecimento produzido a respeito dos aspectos referentes ao estudante na construção da IM. Método: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa de estudos empíricos publicados em periódicos indexados na MEDLINE e LILACS, utilizando a expressão medical identity e os descritores identity crisis, social identification, physician's role e professional role. Os critérios de inclusão foram: textos completos disponíveis em português, espanhol, francês ou inglês de estudos empíricos sobre fatores que influenciam na formação da IM com foco nos aspectos relacionados ao estudante e tendo médicos ou estudantes de graduação em Medicina como participantes. Resultado: Na primeira etapa, identificaram-se 1.365 artigos. Foram triados 194 artigos para leitura em profundidade. Destes, incluíram-se 18 para análise temática com classificação em categorias em diálogo com a literatura, tendo como base o conceito de IM saudável. A maioria dos artigos foi publicada na última década. Identificaram-se três categorias: expectativa versus realidade, referente ao que o estudante pensa sobre o que um médico é ou deveria ser; médico "super-herói", relativa à percepção caricaturada da medicina criada pelos próprios alunos e oferecida pela sociedade por meio de programas, séries e filmes televisivos; e modelagem de papéis, que diz respeito à importância da experiência prática do estudante supervisionada por um preceptor ou docente. A IM construída ao longo do curso médico influencia na forma como a medicina é exercida e, quando ela não é congruente com a realidade que o recém-formado encontra, provoca sofrimento no médico e interfere na atuação profissional dele. Conclusão: Instituições de ensino, professores e preceptores devem estar atentos às expectativas e às idealizações de seus alunos sobre o que é ser um médico e o papel desse profissional na sociedade, de maneira a promover intervenções que auxiliem em uma construção identitária mais saudável e mais resiliente às intempéries peculiares à profissão médica.

Abstract: Introduction: The Medical Identity (MI) construction is a dynamic phenomenon influenced by factors related to the student, the educational environment and society. Objective: To synthesize the produced knowledge about the student-related aspects regarding the construction of the MI. Method: This is an integrative review of empirical studies published in journals indexed in the MEDLINE and LILACS databases, using the term Medical Identity and the descriptors Identity Crisis, Social Identification, Physician's Role and Professional Role. The inclusion criteria were: full texts available in Portuguese, Spanish, French or English of empirical studies on factors that influence the development of MI focused on student-related aspects and having physicians or undergraduate medical students as participants. Results: In the first stage, 1,365 articles were identified. Subsequently, 194 articles were chosen for in-depth reading. Of these, 18 were included for thematic analysis with classification into categories in dialogue with the literature, based on the concept of healthy MI. Most articles were published in the last decade. Three categories were identified: expectation versus reality, related to what the student thinks about what a physician is or should be; the 'superhero' physician, related to the caricatured perception of Medicine created by the students themselves and offered by society through TV programs, series and films; and role modeling, which concerns the importance of the student's practical experience supervised by a preceptor or teacher. The MI built throughout the medical course influences the way medicine is practiced and when it is not consistent with the reality that the recently graduated student encounters, it causes suffering to the physician and interferes with their professional performance. Conclusion: Educational institutions, teachers and preceptors must be aware of the expectations and ideals of their students about what it means to be a physician and the role of this professional in society, aiming to promote interventions that help establishing a healthier and more resilient identity construction, particular to the medical profession.

Qualitative Analysis of the Roles of Physicians and Nurses in Providing Decision Support to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia and Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the roles of hematologists and other professionals in providing decision support to patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia and lymphoma. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews involving 11 hematologists in Japan. RESULT: We identified 7 categories related to the roles of hematologists in providing direct decision support to patients: (1) preparing patients before informed consent, (2) selecting the information to convey, (3) choosing a method for conveying this information, (4) respecting the intentions of patients and their families, (5) directing decision-making and considering fairness, (6) considering the emotional aspects of patients and their families, and (7) providing support after discussing treatment options. We also identified the following 5 subcategories related to the roles of hematologists in multidisciplinary collaboration: (1) communicating with other professionals, (2) gathering information from them, (3) providing information to them, (4) managing the entire medical team, and (5) encouraging nurses to actively participate with patients throughout the decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Through content analysis, the hematologist's direct role in decision-making was extracted as preparation and consideration in situations where information about decision-making is communicated, and emotional support after the information is communicated. In addition, active participation in discussions, sharing information about the patient's situation and relevant discussions, and emotional support as the hematologist's expected roles in other professions were extracted. The results therefore suggest that a multidisciplinary team is needed to share information and provide multidimensional support to patients.

Ethical Dilemmas in Physicians' Consultations with COPD Patients.

Aim: This phenomenological study was aimed at exploring principal physicians' (participants') experience of attending to COPD patients and motivating their self-management, in light of the GOLD clinical guidelines of COPD therapy. Methods: Interviews were conducted with nine physicians, who had referred patients to PR, five general practitioners (GPs) and four lung specialists (LSs). The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed through a process of deconstruction and reconstruction. Results: The participants experienced several ethical dilemmas in being principal physicians of COPD patients and motivating their self-management; primarily in the balancing act of adhering to the Hippocratic Oath of promoting health and saving lives, while respecting their patients' choice regarding non-adherence eg, by still smoking. It was also a challenge to deal with COPD as a nicotine addiction disease, deal with patients' denial regarding the harm of smoking and in motivating patient mastery of the disease. The participants used various strategies to motivate their patients' self-management such as active patient education, enhancing the patients' inner motivation, by means of an interdisciplinary approach, involving the patients' significant other when appropriate, and by proposing PR. Conclusion: The findings indicate that being a principal physician of COPD patients and motivating their self-management is a balancing act, involving several dilemmas. Patients' nicotine addiction and physicians' ethical obligations are likely to create ethical dilemmas as the physician is obligated to respect the patients' will, even though it contradicts what is best for the patient. The participants suggest strategies to motivate COPD patients' self-management.